From the Seattle Times, on a 12-year-old austic artist:
In the past, Wil would have been called a “savant,” a term now considered insensitive. Dager calls him extraordinarily talented.
“Savant” is insensitive? The more precise term I think of, and one that I can understand the dislike for, is “idiot savant“, where the juxtaposition of mental incapacities and shocking (savantish) talent is expressed explicitly.
But savant by itself? I’m wondering if this is me being out of touch with usage preferences and taboos in the autistic/special-needs/mental-health sector (possible), or there was some editing damage done to this article that reduced “idiot savant” to “savant” out of the same sensitivity that was then still being vestigially addressed in the paragraph.
Sounds like a research project.